AIR GUARD SAWF-07P & SAWF-08P: Displaying info and graphics

eWeLink App
1

I suggest that the order in which these two devices present their information should be more homogeneous between both and different from the current version (1.1.1).

For the 07P (PM 2.5 & PM10) the current order is good:
1.- PM 2.5 (Ok)
2.- PM 10 (Ok)
3.- Temp. (Ok)
4.- Hum. (Ok)
5.- History (Ok)

and in the historical graphs, more suitable in this order:
1.- PM 2.5
2.- PM 10
3.- Temp.
4.- Hum.

This order more suitable for 08P (CO2)
1.- CO2
2.- Temp.
3.- Hum.
4.- History

and in the historical graphs more suitable in this order:
1.- CO2
2.- Temp.
3.- Hum.

Greetings

2

Thank you very much for your valuable feedback. We will evaluate it internally.

3

Excellent idea. I honestly think you guys should be doing this kind of consultation during the design phase, before launching new products. Because right now, the fixes for this - and for the SNZB‑02D R2, for example - don’t exactly make for great marketing material.

Go grab a beer with the eWeLink team; they can explain how to do it better. Simply ask @MichaelLearnsToCode :slight_smile:

Warmest regards.

4

Oh, and one last point about the Threshold settings: In the SAWF-07P, the PM 10 setting thresholds is simply missing, while the PM 2.5 setting is correct.

Greetings

5

@Nancy-ProductManager

SONOFF AirGuard CO2 Matter Over Wi-Fi Air Quality Monitor | SAWF-08P

Good afternoon, I would like to be able to customize the sound and color indicators for this product using the Matter. I hope this will be possible via a firmware update. Thank you in advance.

6

How’s it going?
Another thing that could be super useful is having the option to have history by the minute, 10 minutes, or at least half an hour. A lot of information is lost in hourly entries because it only records the value at that specific point in time.

@Nancy-Gerente de Producto

7

Thanks for reaching out. We understand your request to customize the sound and color indicators . We’ll review this with our R&D team and evaluate feasibility for a future firmware update. If we have any progress, we’ll share an update.
Thank you for the suggestion!

8

Thanks for the suggestion. We agree that hourly records can miss important changes. We’ll evaluate adding more granular history intervals and review the impact on storage and performance for a future firmware update. We’ll keep you posted if this is added to our roadmap.

9

Thanks, Nancy.

Another thing that came to mind is offering a paid option or having that option only in iHost.