I suggest that the order in which these two devices present their information should be more homogeneous between both and different from the current version (1.1.1).
For the 07P (PM 2.5 & PM10) the current order is good:
1.- PM 2.5 (Ok)
2.- PM 10 (Ok)
3.- Temp. (Ok)
4.- Hum. (Ok)
5.- History (Ok)
and in the historical graphs, more suitable in this order:
1.- PM 2.5
2.- PM 10
3.- Temp.
4.- Hum.
This order more suitable for 08P (CO2)
1.- CO2
2.- Temp.
3.- Hum.
4.- History
and in the historical graphs more suitable in this order:
1.- CO2
2.- Temp.
3.- Hum.
Excellent idea. I honestly think you guys should be doing this kind of consultation during the design phase, before launching new products. Because right now, the fixes for this - and for the SNZB‑02D R2, for example - don’t exactly make for great marketing material.
Go grab a beer with the eWeLink team; they can explain how to do it better. Simply ask @MichaelLearnsToCode
Oh, and one last point about the Threshold settings: In the SAWF-07P, the PM 10 setting thresholds is simply missing, while the PM 2.5 setting is correct.
SONOFF AirGuard CO2 Matter Over Wi-Fi Air Quality Monitor | SAWF-08P
Good afternoon, I would like to be able to customize the sound and color indicators for this product using the Matter. I hope this will be possible via a firmware update. Thank you in advance.